The -decay process, discovered around 1900, is basically the decay of a neutron . In the laboratory, a proton and an electron are observed as the decay products of the neutron. Therefore, considering the decay of a neutron as a two-body decay process, it was predicted theoretically that the kinetic energy of the electron should be a constant. But experimentally, it was observed that the electron kinetic energy has a continuous spectrum. Considering a three-body decay process, i.e. , around 1930, Pauli explained the observed electron energy spectrum. Assuming the anti-neutrino to be massless and possessing negligible energy, and the neutron to be at rest, momentum and energy conservation principles are applied. From this calculation, the maximum kinetic energy of the electron is . The kinetic energy carried by the proton is only the recoil energy.
If the anti-neutrino had a mass of (where c is the speed of light) instead of zero mass, what should be the range of the kinetic energy, , of the electron?
If the anti-neutrino had a mass of (where c is the speed of light) instead of zero mass, what should be the range of the kinetic energy, , of the electron?
- (A)
- (B)
- (C)
- (D)✓ Correct
Answer: (D)
Solution
If the anti-neutrino has a rest mass of , it must have at least this much energy (its rest mass energy). This reduces the maximum kinetic energy available to the electron. The electron's kinetic energy can still be zero (when it's at rest and the anti-neutrino and proton carry away all the energy), but the maximum is now less than eV because some energy must go into the anti-neutrino's rest mass. Therefore, eV.
JEE Advanced · 2012 · 08 Apr 2012 · Paper 2 · Single correct option